What I would like to focus upon is DUE Process. Did they have a Warrant directly for LaVoy? When they pulled him over it was automatic Arrest. Did LaVoy fear for his life when no warrant with Affadivit was clearly provided as per Law? These things should be the focus. LaVoy is dead. Now comes guts.
Who had a lawful warrant? Was the warrant wet ink signed by a Judge backed by a sworn affidavit for cause? Was the warrant lawfully served or was there even an attempt to serve? Or did the Highwaymen simply disregard due process? Did the highwaymen accost and attempt to subdue a man in his right to go from point A to point B without due process of any established law?
These are the questions which need to be resolved immediately.
The situation could have been resolved by simply surrendering and resolving in a constitutional court with proper support. Sundance kid resort does not qualify to remedy. See Bonny and Clyde. It is all of us who allowed LaVOY to Perish, for we sit smug in our armchair jury rooms of apathetic complacecny and allow it to happen. Some old women and men who see injustice, but have never faced might is right warfare, may make all sorts of justifications in their ill conceived sense of right -V-Wrongs, but are very reluctant to toe the line. If it hurts get a band aid, and quit your dual parties of Publicans and demoncrats, and get aboard real warfare by US corrupt courts, join NLA, contribute to NLA, back NLA, http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org
and refrain from yap yapping as dogs to and elephant in your living room…No persoanal attack meant to anyone…just reflect as to your freedom and the fight needed to insure your freedom.
the argument must be then there was a conspiracy to simply single out Finicum…the man with guns….right? who else was killed Boudreau? Very bad investigation in my opinion…..all was free but this Finicum fellow, who may or may not have pulled a weapon…your arguments are baseless…..go back to RULE OF LAW and CONSTITUTIONAL CHECK. WAS their a RIGHT for him to Disregard a non Constitutional arrest at CHECKPOINT? IT is all NULL and VOID otherwise.
The point is, Finicum is DEAD. Focus on what led up to his death. I would that anyone would at this point stop speculation and concentrate on Due Process and Law as per Constitution of Man, isnt this what NLA is about? If you are so inclined to join a radical militia.. then there have you…grab a 9mm and get after it…..kill em all……or FOCUS……ON the PROBLEM and how to CORRECT it. IF you people want war, then it is up to you, though you will never ever get off of your couches to advance. Old women and disfunctile old men you are….but the way to defeat them is by your supporting NLA in COURT. After all it is your grandchildren, great grandchildren (If there are any) WHO WILL PAY the price for apathetic complacency
There simply was no Warrant for the arrest of Mr. Finicum. There was no Due Process. The unconstitutional Road block had NO WARRANT. Illegal and UNLAWFUL. This the avenue to take. Forget all eyewitnesses to their Unlawfulness. IT was a WARRANTLESS and UNLAWFULL STOPPAGE of HIS right TO TRAVEL.
Here is the page complaint against the Bundy’s
Title 18: 372 If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(d)(1)(D), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809.)
Note: the complaint was filed on Jan. 27th one (1) day after LaVoy Finicum was Killed. This tells me that they were not properly served. At any time the FBI could have peacefully served signed warrants along with Affidavits, then had every right to put an end to the occupation of the Malheur Wildlife buildings, but have not or did not follow due process.
According to FBI Agent Armstrong’s affidavit, the Warrants were prepared and signed, though I did not see anyone step up and offer a warrant to LaVoy Finicum or the others in that vehicle. Because Ammon and Ryan Bundy are being held without bail until brought to court by the Feds, for the feds and Federal Judges, etc. It is impossible for them to have any kind of a fair trial. Now is the time to file Writ of Habeas Corpus and make their counter claim to bring this into a Court of Record, and bring any man or woman forth who are not under color of the law, who can testify under oath that the Bundy’s and the others caused Harm, Injury or Loss.
57. lbis affidavit and the requested arrest warrants were all reviewed by two
Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) prior to being submitted to the Court. The AUSAs
infonned me that in their opinion, the affidavit is legally and factually sufficient to establish
probable cause to support the issuance of the requested warrants. I respectfully request the Court
to authorize the proposed arrest warrants based on this complaint.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th, day of January 2016.
Judge STACIE F. BECKER
That was copied from PDF File. Now If the Affidavit was signed and arrest warrants were not yet submitted on the 26th on the day of the arrest and shooting, then I do not believe the highway men had warrants with them. The paperwork shows to be filed on the 27th.
There is no doubt that LaVoy Finicum was singled out. However when he fled and then almost struck the three vehicles at the road block, he himself put himself in peril. Does this justify his death?
I can only say, I was not there, the video is not very revealing.
But I can say…..DUE Process.
Earlier this month, the father of 11 told CNN he doesn’t want to die — but would never go behind bars.
“I’m just not going to prison,” Finicum said. “Look at the stars. There’s no way I’m going to sit in a concrete cell where I can’t see the stars and roll out my bedroll on the ground. That’s just not going to happen. I want to be able to get up in the morning and throw my saddle on my horse and go check on my cows. It’s OK. I’ve lived a good life. God’s been gracious to me.
The entire point being, the reason the authorities gave was a “Traffic Stop”, which they think will bamboozle the American people for justification, and I believe they in fact did not have warrants. Neither did they have probable cause. It was definitely a set up. And needs to be pursued as violation of due process immediately. There must be a claim made along with Writ of Habeas Corpus in a Common Law Court of Record. LaVoy Finicums Wife needs to make suit immediately and demand restitution. I know this sounds cold, but only this way can the Federal Government’s conspiracy be revealed.
After three days of Video Analysis, I may need to concede. All the above seems to be the case. Finicum fled approached the road block, which very well have been an ambush. The reason I will say this now, is note the Law Enforcement officer come around the truck as Finicum plowed into the snow bank. The officer ran to cover the front of the vehicle in direct line of fire to the driver.
Play the 12 second mark over and over. The same guy who ran in front of Finicum’s truck as he plowed into the snow bank is the very one who you are saying shot LaVOY and then scurried away.
The windshield is full of bulletholes from that guys shots to the front of the truck.
However there must be due process in a Constitutional Court.
Restore the Common Law of Man Part 9