Have you Accepted the Judaic Beast ?

Will you be Raptured right into the waiting arms of the beast?

KJV

Matthew 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

For many shall come in my name,

saying,

I am Christ;

(How do you suppose one will come in the name of Jesus, and then say he is Jesus? Use your noggin. The wolves in sheep’s clothing, i.e., Hagee-ites, TBN’rs, Catholicos, etc., will come in Jesus Name and even say he is the Christ, but deceive many. RP)

and shall deceive many.

And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows.

Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.

10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.

Mark 13:

But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them.

10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.

11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost.

12 Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death.

13 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

(Those very same members of your family, yes you know them, those who are Judaised, the complacent apostates of the Darby/Untermier/Scofield judaised rapture-in- secrecy ones, who say Lord, Lord, with their lips, but “Keel all em arabs, bomb bomb Iran”, in their hearts….yes your brothers and your sisters. And they are about to be raptured right into the benevolent arms of Satan, by their Judaisers. RP)

BEWARE !

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php?title=Psak_5767_Tevet_6e

This statement is part of a series of twenty requests for piskei din (legal rulings) that have been submitted to the Beis Din by those who follow its rulings. While full piskei din (legal rulings) are in preparation, a brief summary is presented. The summary below is not meant to be used as a source for deriving any practical consequences. It will be replaced at a later date with a formal ruling.’

On the 6 Tevet, 5767 (27 December, 2006), the Beis Din for Bnei Noah was asked:

Image:BDBN.gif
Jerusalem Court for Issues of Bnei Noah
Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
Email: dbtc@actcom.com 47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228

What is the meaning of the Noahide Oath?

Contents

What is the meaning of the Noahide Oath?

Question: What is the meaning of the Noahide Oath?

What is halachic implications of a Noahide pledge or oath before a Beis Din? (Synagogue) (Council)

Answer. To achieve formal status, a non-Jew today has to make a declaration before a Beit Din of Jews. According to many authorities, there is value to the declaration of a person before a rabbinical court – beis din – that he or she accept and takes upon himself or herself the mitzvos of Bnei Noah. Therefore it is incumbent upon the beis din to accept such declarations from almost anyone who wants to make them.

(Accepting the BEAST. RP)

The beis din facilitates declarations to allow Noahides to have a deeper and potentially more rewarding religious experience. This is according to the teaching that someone who observes a commandment after being obligated to do so is greater [perhaps: ‘receives a greater reward’] than someone who voluntarily decides to keep a commandment whenever he or she feels like doing so.

(Must make oath and renounce Jesus namesake.RP)

The Noahide stands before the beis din and makes a declaration of intent. This is not an oath, and there is currently no way to enforce compliance by the beis din. This is the most minimal form of declaration that can be made. After making the declaration, the beis din gives out a certificates saying that such-and-such person made such a declaration. Nothing more is written on the certificate. The declaration expresses intent on the part of the applicant to uphold Noahide law. It does not imply in any way that the beis din agrees with the applicant’s actions, understanding, or approach to Noahide law.

(However, when they “Reveal” that Son of Perdition, AKA, Moshiach Ben David, compliance will be enforced, see 2 Thes.2. RP )

What about abuse of the Noahide Pledge?

Question: What about abuse of the Noahide Pledge

Recently, the beis din has heard objections on the part of Noahides concerning the potential abuse of the declaration by missionaries and those who might take the oath for ulterior motives. The suggestion was made to cross-examine applicants as the their beliefs.

Answer. The functions of a beis din does not include investigation. Evidence is to be brought to the court by the sides to a dispute, and related to by the court – very much like a court in the anglo-saxon tradition. The court does not investigate. It has no means of investigation.

(By their man given laws of Talmud Bavly of Babylon, only by ONE witness, is evidence enough, and the only penalty to be meted out is by Decapitation, Sanhedrin Tractate 57a. RP)

The tradition is that a beis din hears claims, witnesses, reviews documents, issues decisions, presents documents to the sides in a case and a few other documents of the courts decision. In the classical case of convert a beis din makes the decision if to accept the convert after talking with the convert and being convinced in one or more face to face meetings that the convert is not lying. In the case of converts as a rule the strength of the motivation of the candidate is tried by refusing to convert him or her at the first request, although this is often waived if there is good reason to believe that the request to convert is Bona-Fide.

(to denounce “That Man Jesus as GOD. RP)

In an attempt to provide the most minimal bona-fide test of a applicant, it was decided by the court of Rabbi Schwartz in Jerusalem to include in the declaration which our beis din will require for a person with christian background, that “that person” is not and was not any part of a divinity, and was not a messiah.

This however is not a halachic statement concerning these beliefs. The beis din of Rabbi Schwartz in Jerusalem has issued no ruling on these issues.

What about those who hold “that person” is messiah?

Question: What about those who hold “that person” is messiah?

People who hold that he is not and was not any part of a divinity, but still holds that he was a messiah.

Answer: It is the opinion of Rabbi Schwartz that a person who believes that “that man” was a messiah is not transgressing any prohibition. However the issue is as follows: someone who believes that “that man” was a messiah seems to be only partly disassociating himself from full christianity, and there is a problem of what is meant by the term “messiah”. Is the messiah a “divine messenger” to “save” the world. Now when I say “a divine messenger” I mean someone – otherwise normal human being – sent by “the divinity” as a messenger. It seems that some people mean “a person with divine attributes”!

An issue which could be seen as semantic becomes of major consequence.

The decision of Rabbi Schwartz is therefore that in the beis din over which he presides he will not accept declarations of people with christian background if they think that “that man” was a messiah. This DOES NOT MEAN that the declaration of such a person before any [other] beis din is valueless. Perhaps another beis din will be satisfied that the person before them is bona fide in acceptance of the totally non-divinity of “that man”. They may accept the declaration, and it will be fully valid.

(Ah, but for they who say the jews are the chosen-ites, they who would be Talmudically Secretly Raptured, no need to fret, you all will glady be “Accepted, for you believed not the Truth in Righteousness, So that God has sent you strong delusion. You will be safe for at least 3.5 years, but woe unto them who seek the Day of the LORD. RP)

Rev 20:

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years

(Good luck with all that Secret Rapture Hogwash! RP)

Please also see : http://www.samliquidation.com/fourth_beast.htm

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s